Sunday 24 May 2015

【版权】| Copyright

昨晚在某些投资网站溜溜,既然看到笔者的几个作品被仿制又没交代来源。其中一个贴已在此部落格分享,其他都是只在一个论坛活动的聚会而分享。版权,必须被尊重,尤其是已经被作者写出来,而不是单凭口讲的。作品已经公布在作者的部落格,如果被仿制来转分享,必须放入原作人的名。给予那些连笔者都没公开的作品也拿来仿制,简直是太过分!笔者将不在此指名道姓,但希望此人看到此贴后会反省。

无意中也看到某些投资者对基本面+长期投资+包赚的不认同看法。其实,所谓的长期投资很多都被人误解。给予一位有经验和基本分析能力的人,也许他们会有跟我有同样的思维。关于此话题,笔者过后再跟大家谈谈。

I have visited some investment related websites on yesterday night. Surprisingly, I found some of my articles have been copied yet do not review the source of writer name. One of the article has been posted in this blog and others were shared in a talk organized by a investment forum. Copyright must be respected especially in written form (compared to verbal talk). For the article already posted in blog is well come to share again but it need to mention the source of writer name or link. For those articles which never post by writer but posted by 3rd party, I shall say he/she is having a very bad manner in sharing. I will not mention the name but hope this person will realize what need to do after read this post.

At the same time, I found some investors are still unsure the meaning of (fundamental analysis + long term investment + surely profit). The term and meaning of long term investment is mostly been twisted by public. For an investor which are experienced and coupled with FA skill, he/she should has the same thinking alike me. I will discuss more on this topic in next post.

2 comments:

yy said...

应该指名道姓,不然,没有效果的。:)

Angie said...

Copycats do exist everywhere, e.g. course works/thesis in universities, proposals in workplace, investment analysis in the blogs, etc.
Copycat writes in anything that's been already posted. These cats are lazy yet they want to take credits for works done by others. Because of this, I can feel your outright frustration.

All articles are dated, and it makes it easier to identify who have copied who.

Y2K has been doing good jobs or the copycats would not bother to get them copied and reproduced.

To the copycats out there, please show some respects for hardworks bloggers have put in. Is it so hard to quote the source of references?